Annuity Comparisons

Annuities vs Stocks

by Annuities Explained on July 15, 2010


Annuities and stocks are in many ways entirely different animals. Thankfully, they co-operate, and when used together they make an excellent retirement plan.

One cannot honestly compare annuities and stocks because they are simply far too different, and serve two entirely different purposes. Stocks are ownership in a company, purchased as a means to generate capital gains and minor income disbursements in the form of dividends. Annuities are the polar opposite, fixed income investments which do not allow for capital gains (except variable annuities) and are geared toward providing an income.

One major difference between an annuity and a stock is the tax schedule. Annuities are taxed just like regular income. So, if you were to purchase a $40,000 annuity that pays out a total of $50,000 in monthly payments, you would owe full income taxes on the $10,000 “profit.” The personal income tax rates go as high as 35% depending on your tax bracket. A $40,000 purchase of stock that rises to $50,000 would create the same taxed income–$10,000–but would not create the same tax burden. The long term capital gains tax is just 15%.

However, annuity taxation should not be the entire basis of your investment decisions, though they should play a part. You should also consider the amount of risk you’re willing to accept with your investment portfolio.

Fixed annuities will provide a guaranteed, absolute yearly return as well as consistent monthly income checks. Annuities are even backed against failure by your own state government!

Stocks will provide an income if they pay dividends (usually a fraction of what you would earn with the same investment in an annuity) but they rise and fall on a daily basis, and do not have nearly the same protection as an annuity.

One final difference are the returns you’d expect to receive from an annuity and a stock portfolio. The US stock markets have historically gained a healthy 10.5% per year whereas annuities perform just over the current triple-AAA rated bond yields. So the difference between the two in returns can be very, very important to overall portfolio performance.

$10,000 invested in a stock portfolio that returns 10% per year would grow to more than $67,000 in 20 years. $10,000 invested in an annuity with a performance of say, 6% per year would come out to $32,000.

As you can see, a 4% difference in yields creates a scenario in which stocks rise more than twice as fast as annuities.

The Bottomline:

If you have plenty of time before retiring (more than 15 years) you’d be smart to invest in stocks, as they’ll allow for quicker, albeit riskier, growth. If you’re nearing retirement and need consistency more than you need returns, then annuities are the way to go.

The bottomline is that too much one or the other will hurt you just as much as too little of each. So be sure to never overweight fixed income investments (annuities or bonds) when you’ve got time to take risks and never overweight stocks when you’re running out of time. If you follow that simple rule, you’ll never mess it up!

Annuities vs Mutual Funds

by Annuities Explained on July 15, 2010


Annuities and mutual funds are two entirely different investments, with entirely different purposes, but both can be used to build a solid financial footing throughout retirement.

The only fair comparison between annuities and mutual funds (especially stock mutual funds) is in comparing periodic-payment annuities and standard stock mutual funds.

Periodic-payment annuities are those that allow you to invest in chunks. Very much like a standard stock mutual fund that allows you to invest as little as $25 monthly, you can invest whatever sum you’d like into a periodic-payment deferred annuity to build up capital until you decide to receive monthly payments. As you can see, annuities and mutual funds are very much similar here.

Where the two investment types diverge is in their performance, and how their performance works. For this example, we’ll use an S&P 500 index mutual fund and a deferred annuity based on the S&P 500. You would think that the performance of the mutual fund and the deferred annuity would be similar, since they track the same investments, but you’d be dead wrong.

Your annuity cannot lose money.

What? Wait! I thought all investments were risky.

Nope, not all investments are created equally. The S&P 500 mutual fund tracks the performance of the S&P 500 index up and down, whereas the annuity based on the S&P 500 index only tracks the index when it moves up.

The deferred variable annuity based on the S&P 500 rises in value with the S&P500 but only to a certain degree. You see, your annuity broker will promise to protect you from stock market drops, but they also limit your upside. For example, if the S&P500 index were to rise 15% in one year, your S&P500 mutual fund would appreciate by 15% where your annuity may rise the maximum cap of 7-10%. However, if the S&P500 were to plunge 20%, your annuity would lose nothing and your mutual fund would lose the full 20%. When the stock market is performing well, the mutual fund will outperform the annuity, but in bear markets your annuity will perform better.

Finding common ground

Investing in stock mutual funds at 65 is like betting on horses to secure your retirement. Likewise, investing all your money in an annuity at 20 is equivalent to stocking all your cash under a mattress for extreme safety. Both can be used in conjunction with one another, and effectively as well.

Conventional wisdom is to take 100, subtract your age from it, and that is the amount you should have invested in stocks, the other part should be in fixed income. A 30-year old, for example, should invest his or her money 30% in fixed income (like an annuity) and 70% in stocks. At 40, that same person would invest 10% more in fixed income and 10% less in stocks. Simple, right?

A proper balance of annuities and stock mutual funds will allow for solid capital appreciation as well as safety in turbulent markets. It isn’t about one or the other, its all about a proper blend of both at just the right time.

Annuities vs Life Insurance

July 15, 2010

Have you ever wondered why so frequently life insurance companies are also in the business of selling annuities? Well, the answer is quite simple. Life insurance companies take a huge risk in betting that you’ll live a very long time to pay your monthly premiums to ultimately collect a payout smaller than the [...]

Read the full article →

Annuities vs IRAs

July 15, 2010

So you wanted a comparison, huh? Well, we’re not going to give you one. No, that would be silly! Annuities and IRAs should be used side-by-side. However, some of their benefits are the same for both annuities and IRAs.
An IRA is an individual retirement account in which you can put financial [...]

Read the full article →

Annuities vs Bonds

July 15, 2010

Annuities and bonds are very often compared because they generally provide near equal returns as well as inherent safety. Also, both financial products are largely part of a long term financial plan, and are most likely used at the end of the planning stage, rather than the beginning.
Where the two products diverge isn’t in [...]

Read the full article →

Annuities vs CDs

July 15, 2010

Ahh, the infamous question of what kind of fixed income investment is the best. We’ll try to answer this question, laying out the pros and cons, and how you should evaluate what is best for your situation.
It is obvious from the comparison that you’re looking for a solid, predictable, fixed income investment, [...]

Read the full article →